Re: To KVM or not to KVM

To: Debian-user List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: To KVM or not to KVM
From: Paula R T Coelho <paulartcoelho@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:16:34 -0200
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTik+TqyKMgJoxnUmsZHEz3HHRC2EPT-ZsCsdOUqz@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTinv13dXzZ193TOSAqNeU3W+VRRSew8TiwKKEZio@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 201011111623.24406.d_baron@012.net.il> <[🔎] 4CDC0503.5000005@utica.edu> <[🔎] AANLkTinv13dXzZ193TOSAqNeU3W+VRRSew8TiwKKEZio@mail.gmail.com>

On 11 November 2010 14:23, B. Alexander <storm16@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you are running Linux-on-Linux, you might consider either vserver
> or openvz. It does virtual containers similar to Sunacle Solaris'

or Xen hypervisor
www.xen.org

Reply to:

References:
- To KVM or not to KVM
  - From: David Baron <d_baron@012.net.il>
- Re: To KVM or not to KVM
  - From: "David A. Parker" <dparker@utica.edu>
- Re: To KVM or not to KVM
  - From: "B. Alexander" <storm16@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Gnuplot generated png files not displayed in html files.
Next by Date: Re: Problems with /etc/modprobe.conf
Previous by thread: Re: To KVM or not to KVM
Next by thread: Problems with /etc/modprobe.conf
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread