In <email@example.com>, Camaleón wrote: >On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 +0000 (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message: >>> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed? > >No, I think this has nothing to do with the router. Just look at Adam's >traceroute when using "-I" (without "-z"): > >Different hardware (I suppose Adam is not using the old Nokia DSL >router), same behaviour. Some hops are lost (timed out) unless "-z" is >specified when runned on linux hosts (on windows systems is not needed). >So what can make the difference? Iptables? Perhaps on MS Windows the behavior of "-z" is implicit. While MS Windows doesn't have iptables, it does have it's own firewall system that fills a similar role. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. firstname.lastname@example.org ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.