[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: basic ping diff with windows ping

In <pan.2010.>, Camaleón wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 +0000 (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
>>> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
>No, I think this has nothing to do with the router. Just look at Adam's
>traceroute when using "-I" (without "-z"):
>Different hardware (I suppose Adam is not using the old Nokia DSL
>router), same behaviour. Some hops are lost (timed out) unless "-z" is
>specified when runned on linux hosts (on windows systems is not needed).
>So what can make the difference? Iptables?

Perhaps on MS Windows the behavior of "-z" is implicit.

While MS Windows doesn't have iptables, it does have it's own firewall system 
that fills a similar role.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                   ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@iguanasuicide.net                   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy         `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/                    \_/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: