[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT Firewire networking (was: Ethernet port dead)



On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:25:40 -0600, Morgan Gangwere wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <> wrote:
> 
>> But... what kind of device is that? Are you using an adapter (firewire
>> to ethernet)? :-?
> 
> the 1394 standard says that a computer which supports 1394 must also
> support "1394 networking". Short end of it, if you need to move some
> data between two 1394 capable computers, you use that. They act like
> normal, everyday, nondescript ether ports in software, no less.

I don't have it :-)

Look, I have 2 firewire controllers:

sm01@stt008:~$ lspci | grep 1394
06:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB82AA2 IEEE-1394b Link Layer Controller (rev 01)
11:03.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB22/A IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link)

But not their ethernet counterpart (just the "real" devices):

sm01@stt008:~$ dmesg | grep -i eth
[    6.296132] Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
[    8.835653] Driver 'sr' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
[    8.939032] eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1) 00:30:48:d9:08:27
[    8.971270] eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
[    8.989936] eth0: MAC: 7, PHY: 6, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
[   12.105820] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
[   12.263452] eth1: RTL8169sb/8110sb at 0xffffc20002894000, 00:1d:0f:be:b6:ad, XID 10000000 IRQ 20
[   40.041511] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[   40.928617] eth0: Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[   40.952349] eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
[   40.974738] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
[   47.063355] r8169: eth1: link down
[   47.086842] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
[   53.459758] eth0: no IPv6 routers present

It's like Rodolfo's ethernet device got messed in some way and the system 
now detects his ethernet connection as Firewire.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


Reply to: