On 09/08/2010 04:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-09-08 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:I'll be looking at the the version 6 chromium-browser when it shows up in testing. (The version 5 browser was removed today.)Could be a long time until this happens. Meanwhile, there is no real reason why you couldn't try the sid version.
I'm pretty patient. I was impressed by version 5, but I'm not in a hurry for version 6 -- unless Iceweasel goes south for some reason. I've had that happen before, back when I was running Lenny. Something happened where I lost any ability to run Java at the one site where I allowed its use (thinks.com -- crossword puzzles), and JavaScript / Flash were *really* iffy.
I'm especially interested in seeing what they're doing for flash support. I understand that it's to be integrated into the browser. (Well, the Google version, anyway.) I wonder how that's going to work.Not at all in Chromium on Linux, I think.
Yes, I've been straightened out on that. It will be interesting to see how it goes.
I use Iceweasel and have just got used to it. It's really not a bad browser for me. I use the gnash plugin, noscript and adblock from the Debian repositories, and the browser is all right -- until I play too many movies or enable Java temporarily for an online crossword puzzle. At that point the laptop's CPU temp reading jumps about 20 C. Sometimes I have to kill the browser and related processes.Well, at least you don't need to worry about the gnash plugin eating too many resources in Chromium, since it just crashes right away. :-( Sven
Bwa-ha-ha-ha!You know, though, I think I'd almost rather have flash just crash than have it work half-*ssed. Then I wouldn't waste so much time on youtube.com watching dumb stuff I don't need to be watching. I used to just use youtube-dl, and that tended to make me more choosy about what I would bother with.
Regards, Gilbert