Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format
From: Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 12:57:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201005301257.56411.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTimvWYOPWUaRxXzUYj_CLNeNNKpndRfW2ekD6F_I@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 8763263tpw.fsf@mithlond.arda> <[🔎] pan.2010.05.30.09.19.03@gmail.com> <[🔎] AANLkTimvWYOPWUaRxXzUYj_CLNeNNKpndRfW2ekD6F_I@mail.gmail.com>

On Sunday 30 May 2010 10:44:38 Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> In any case if locales were the reasoning, pt_PT.UTF-8 oughta be "30
> Mai 2010" or something when it's actually just a translation from
> english, "Mai 30 2010".

Erratum:  American or American English.

English English is also not represented, since we too put day month year.

So +1 for ISO.  Does away with all this parochialism!

Lisi

Reply to:

References:
- Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format
  - From: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
- Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>
- Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format
  - From: Nuno Magalhães <nunomagalhaes@eu.ipp.pt>

Prev by Date: ISO date format (was: ls has stopped using the ISO date format)
Next by Date: Re: Acroread: accelerating the search through a PDF
Previous by thread: ISO date format (was: ls has stopped using the ISO date format)
Next by thread: Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread