On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:44:12PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Wednesday 12 May 2010 16:27:08 Nick Douma wrote: > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:24:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On 05/12/2010 04:16 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 12 May 2010 16:04:07 Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > > >>> This issue is because the new udev requires a> .31 kernel with > > >>> sysrq_deprecated=n (I am going off memory here so don't quote me). This > > >>> means you need to first upgrade to the squeeze kernel, reboot, then > > >>> upgrade udev and proceed with the "updgrade". > > >> > > >> Added Tag: needs-to-be-in-release-notes > > > > > > To heck with the Release Notes! This needs to be front and center when > > > you when you do the "apt-get update". > > > > It does appear when you do the aptitude full-upgrade, but it doesn't block > > the output, it just shoots by. > > > > I do wonder how they will handle this when squeeze gets stable. The whole > > update your kernel, reboot, update the rest is a bit too easy to fuck up > > for my taste. I completely assumed that I could just change the apt > > sources.list and do the full-upgrade. > > You should *always* read the release notes first. It is actually rather rare > that a release just needs an 'aptitude full-upgrade'. Usually, perl, apt, > aptitude, or dpkg should be updated first. Well, I did try to look for release notes, but I did not find any for Squeeze.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature