ZFS in Linux (was Re: Filesystem recommendations)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: ZFS in Linux (was Re: Filesystem recommendations)
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 07:18:31 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 4BD43317.8000100@cox.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4BD3DEEF.7050305@allums.com>
References: <[🔎] o2p258ced3f1004241053j28352c68v7fa61b56b021443b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 4BD3425F.6080301@cox.net> <[🔎] 4BD3DEEF.7050305@allums.com>

On 04/25/2010 01:19 AM, Mark Allums wrote:

I wanted to like ZFS, but Sun is now
Oracle, and thus over it hangs a dark cloud. Besides, we can almost get
the benefits of ZFS with Linux RAID plus LVM2.

Even were Sun not owned by Oracle, the likelihood of ZFS in Linux iszero. http://kerneltrap.org/node/8066

Sure there might be (is?) a FUSE implementation, but it'll bewoefully slower than an in-kernel implementation.


--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFS in Linux (was Re: Filesystem recommendations)
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>

References:
- Filesystem recommendations
  - From: "B. Alexander" <storm16@gmail.com>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Filesystem recommendations
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Replies to the list (was: Kernel (de)bug information sent, even if there is no connection)
Next by Date: Re: Sharing Iceweasel's bookmarks through LAN
Previous by thread: Re: Filesystem recommendations
Next by thread: Re: ZFS in Linux (was Re: Filesystem recommendations)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread