Re: Webkit2 (was Re: Epiphany browser continues to get worse and worse)

[Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>]

On 4/20/2010 4:18 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-20 10:41, Mark Allums wrote:
> > On 4/19/2010 11:24 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
> > > On 4/19/2010 10:20 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On 2010-04-19 21:47, Mark Allums wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > > Webkit 2.0 is imminent. Perhaps they are considering moving to it.
> > > > > According to various sources, it is the bee's knees.
> > > >
> > > > Beyond crude process separation, what are it's benefits over v1?
> > >
> > > I don't know. I read the blurb (Slashdot) but was too disinterested to
> > > read the article. Saw similar blurbs in about six other places.
> > > *Somebody's* excited.
> > >
> > > MAA
> > >
> > > (It must be good, it's 2.0!)
> >
> >
> > Let me amend: I forget. I knew the answer to your question when I read
> > it in the blurb, but I'm no longer young, and the reasons for 2.0 have
> > escaped me.
>
> Even though I'm an official Grumpy Old Man, the know the reasons for
> "2.0". It's just that now I know that most of them are screaming piles
> of horse manure.


That won't stop them from moving to it.

MAA