exFAT is... (was Re: Vfat or NTFS?)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: exFAT is... (was Re: Vfat or NTFS?)
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:20:30 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 4B9450DE.6060404@cox.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4B9449DE.9020308@allums.com>
References: <[🔎] 779b039a1003071050u520e7ea8hd5091d4b2433411e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 4B9449DE.9020308@allums.com>

On 2010-03-07 18:50, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]

exFAT would be highly useful, especially on removable drives, if therewere good support on Linux. (There are those who object merely on thegrounds of not using anything to do do with Microsoft, but in that case,we wouldn't use vFAT or NTFS, either.)


Probably bound up in too many legal issues.

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

"If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms."  Mike Ditka

Reply to:

References:
- Vfat or NTFS?
  - From: Russell Gadd <russ.mail.lists@googlemail.com>
- Re: Vfat or NTFS?
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SOLVED] Overwrite existing partition with zeros without hurting partition table? (Debian Lenny)
Next by Date: Re: [SOLVED] Overwrite existing partition with zeros without hurting partition table? (Debian Lenny)
Previous by thread: Re: Vfat or NTFS?
Next by thread: Re: Vfat or NTFS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread