Re: Correct binary for Intel Core i5
Mark Allums put forth on 2/25/2010 1:23 AM:
> On 2/25/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Moore wrote:
>> On Wednesday February 24 2010 11:14:19 pm Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Mark Allums put forth on 2/25/2010 12:04 AM:
>>>> On 2/23/2010 11:20 PM, Peter Tenenbaum wrote:
>>>>> OK, you've convinced me to go with the Intel motherboard. Thanks for
>>>>> all the tips!
>>>> Don't go with the Intel MB unless it will only ever be used for Linux.
>>>> If it might be used for Windows, reconsider.
>>> Wow, that's... an interesting comment. Upon what do you base this
>>> recommendation Mark? During 16 years of experience I've never heard
>>> of a
>>> boxed Intel desktop board having any problems with Windows or vice
>> Indeed. I have been using Intel motherboards for over a decade and I have
>> found them to be more compatible, reliable, and stable than any other
> It's the sucky Intel video. On Linux, it's good enough. On Windows, OP
> will want something a little... better.
Ahh, ok. I admit I've not used the inbuilt video on recent Intel boards in
Windows for anything except normal 2D desktop apps, browsing, etc. I've not
monkeyed with the Windows Aero or whatever they call it of Vista. They seem
fine with 2D only stuff. For any serious 3D apps (gaming) I always go with
an external GPU, usually nVidia.