[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: File system for linux and windows



On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:30:59PM +0000, Bhasker C V wrote:
> Nick Douma wrote:

[snip]

> >>Using NTFS on linux and windows is cool. I have consistently seen that
> >>when there are large number of files, undoubtably,
> >>ntfs volume goes corrupt and chkdsk simply removes files and creates
> >>data loss. I do not have any clue on when the FS goes
> >>corrupt (either when writing using linux or when using in windows - Used
> >>ntfs (kernel), ntfs-3g ... all in vain).
> >
> >I have never had a corrupted NTFS partition from using it with ntfs-3g.
> >I've been using the setup I described above for years now, and the NTFS
> >partitions are used intensively on both Windows and Linux as download
> >partitions (usenet, torrents, etc).
> I think this is the near best solution. This is the 3rd time I am
> trying to capture all data (around 10,000 files)
> from my linux box into the luks ntfs partition. Everything works
> fine. There is no file corruption. But it all
> starts to cruble the moment you use chkdsk. Chkdsk starts deleting
> lots of files and says they are corrupt
> and then on the next run it salvages files saying they are orphaned.

I have used ntfs (the ntfs-3g package, not the kernel ntfs drivers -
there is a difference), and I have never had any problems - that weren't
media related - faulty sector....

are you sure your use the fuse package, and doing a proper umount ?

[snip]

> On total, I lose a lot of files.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: