On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 17:43 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Lale wrote: > > Charles wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700 > >> Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote: > >>>> Hotmail does not like Iceweasel. > >>> Duh! When has Microsoft played well with others except when > >>> politically convenient for them? Have you considered using a > >>> higher quality email provider? > >> > >> I use Hotmail with Firefox and never have any problems. > > > > Yes, it's Iceweasel that has the problem. > > No, it is Hotmail that is broken. If iceweasel truthfully claims to be > iceweasel it gets broken code from hotmail. If iceweasel lies and claims > to be firefox it gets different, better code from hotmail and it works. > > Please stop this FUD about iceweasel! Wow, I would have thought this would have gone without saying in this day and age. Sucks that we're still stuck in 1998 about the browser issue.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part