Re: is it possible to install a desktop-manager without python and perl?
>
>
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: shi.minjue@gmail.com
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: is it possible to install a desktop-manager without
>python and perl?
>Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:04:28 +0800
>
>>On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jochen Schulz<ml@well-adjusted.de>
>wrote:
>>> ??:
>>>>
>>>> thanks, but before I got the benifit of so many languages, I have
>been
>>>> tired of learning them, maybe it cannot be called "learning",
>it's
>>>> just some parallel memory, for none of them bring new concepts to
>>>> C/C++.
>>>
>>> This is plain wrong. How do you do closures in C/C++? What about
>higher
>>> order functions, pattern matching, dynamic typing? How do you even
>dare
>>dynamic typing is so easy, for every object is a piece of memory, so
>a
>>dynamic type is just a memory type.
>>I believe every language has its own advantages, my solution is to
>>integrate all the advantages of all the languages into one language,
>>which can be called any name, not only C/C++, just because gnu/linux
>>is mainly written in C and C++ is the widely used OOP language, so I
>>choose C/C++ as the basis. In this way, we get all the benifit, and
>>avoid all the overlappings among different languages.
>>> to complain about SQL (in another post of yours), if your only
>complaint
>>> is that it is unlike C in some respects? SQL (without stored
>procedures)
>>> is not even turing complete!
>>I surely dare to complain sql, it's a programming languge with all
>the
>>general functions such as string processing, can't you hear the
>>complaint from most programmers? microsoft has even replaced sql
>>programming by .net framework. If you think I complain sql and other
>>languages just because they are unlike C, you are too hard to
>>communicate with.
>>>
>>> If you already know the terms I mentioned and still think they
>don't add
>>> anything to what's already in C/C++ then you didn't understand
>them.
>>>
>>> J.
>>> --
>>> Nothing is as I planned it.
>>> [Agree] [Disagree]
>>>
><http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>>
>>> iEYEARECAAYFAkpAuXEACgkQ+AfZydWK2zkcCACdFwBDimeLaDsEmUMKaS+m538u
>>> ZcIAnRMQmtw186Ogzhud8Cx5GzZ9V2uN
>>> =ZQgK
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
Seems to me the US Government tried this with ADA, supposedly a
"superset" of previous languages. Its failure is well-documented.
Larry
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Fla
>shplayer|Codeblocks)
>>Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl
>>??????,??????,??????,???????....?????????????????,??????
>>
>>
>>--
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.d
>ebian.org
>>
>>
Reply to: