Re: What are kernel patches for?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:30:43PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > I believe that the patch-2.6.29.x applies against the tree of 2.6.29,
> > which is why some hunks would already be present if you try to apply
> > it against 188.8.131.52.
> > The easiest solution is to get the full 184.108.40.206 tree, or get the
> > 2.6.29 tarball and then apply this patch. Someone correct me if I am
> > wrong.
> My understanding is that patch-220.127.116.11 is supposed to patch (the full
> source tree of) 18.104.22.168 to kernel version 22.214.171.124, the idea being
> that it saves you from having to download the current full source
> tree. Isn't that so? If I need to download the full source again, I'd
> download 2.6.30 and won't need to patch anything.
> If you're right and some things that would be patched are already
> present in their patched form, why isn't there an option to just skip
> the parts that are already present and don't need to be patched?
Look at the "alternatives to patch" section here. Specifically, the
That should handle your problem.