Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency
On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim <email@example.com> was heard to say:
>> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote:
>> > Downgrade the following packages:
>> > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)]
>> > Score is 80
>> I wonder why aptitude is suggesting this, downgrading mktemp would not
>> really help.
> According to packages.debian.org, mktemp version 1.6-4 doesn't have
> the problematic dependency, probably because it's a real package and
> not a transitional package.
Surely, but why does aptitude want to downgrade it to 1.5-9 then?