Re: best practice for lvm?
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:23:05AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:46:27PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In <20090603174408.GA25275@m364d1.ece.northwestern.edu>, Zhengquan Zhang
Can I say the best practice for lvm is to create a single partition for
the harddrive and single PV on it
You definitely want separate LVs for any partition (non-system) users can
write to, to avoid running out of space on your / partition. I usually go
overboard and have separate partitions for:
/boot # If / is on LVM; not LV
I would suggest to never put / or /boot on a lvm partition and at most
to put it on a raid1 set. Why incase something goes wrong, raid1 i much
easier to dissect then lvm (and especially lvm on raid)
Does that mean, lvm on raid is easier to dissect than lvm alone?
Be it RAID or not. The easy and best-near-resurrection method
would be to somehow backup the /etc/lvm periodically. This will help
you to restore the LVM VGs and LVs safely.
This is my setup, /boot on raid1 and not on lvm, /root and /home are lvm
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg-root 4.6G 1.9G 2.5G 44% /
tmpfs 1008M 0 1008M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 10M 104K 9.9M 2% /dev
tmpfs 1008M 0 1008M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/md0 92M 24M 63M 28% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg-home 910G 372G 492G 44% /home
/usr/local # For OS migrations.
/var/tmp # RAID 0 or other "fast"
/var/cache # RAID 0 or other "fast"
/tmp # Usually tmpfs; no LV
and leave enough unassigned PE for later enlargement of certain LV?
It is much easier to expand a filesystem than to shrink it. This is true
even if you aren't using LVM.
"I want to thank you for taking time out of your day to come and witness my hanging."
- George W. Bush
at the dedication of his portrait
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Bhasker C V
Registered linux user #306349