On Sat,23.May.09, 19:59:31, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Has that been fixed yet? > > > > Short answer: No. Long answer: see #97564, #254716, #423234 and #509471. > > > > > If not, how can one avoid having aptitude try to upgrade you to a newly > > > release version (before you more directly choose to)? > > > > I'd be interested in a solution as well. > > Are you talking aptitude bug: 514930 > > It has interesting comment > > This bug of aptitude ignoring priority of packages appears to be the > > same as bug #473296 . > > It is fixed in experimental only... Yes, it seems Daniel Burrows fixed it for aptitude. I intend to upgrade my brother's main machine to squeeze, but I will need to enable unstable, at least for the kernel, and I want to have a configuration that won't bring any surprises when squeeze is released. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature