Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> > Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
> > recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
> > reporting erroneous values?
>
> I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:
>
> DVI:
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
> default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
> 1280x1024 60.0*
> 1280x960 60.0
> 1152x864 60.0
> 1024x768 60.0
> 800x600 60.0 56.0
> 640x480 60.0
>
> RGB:
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
> default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
> 800x600 60.0* 56.0
> 640x480 60.0
> 400x300 60.0 56.0
> 320x240 60.0
>
These look like the basic VESA resolutions. I wonder if you could
force any additional resolutions by adding custom modelines to your
xorg.conf file.
dt
--
Dave Thayer | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the
Denver, Colorado USA | author is right there, in the room talking to
dave@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read
| good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"
Reply to: