[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?

Title: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?

Harry Rickards wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Barclay, Daniel wrote:
>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 07:30:25AM EDT, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Plus, even though emacs does other stuff apart from editing, what can
>>> emacs do that a separate tool can't do?
>> It can integrate those separate tools.
>>  > Surely if emacs is more than
>>> an editor, it doesn't follow Doug McIlroy's UNIX philosophy:
>>> Write programs that *do one thing and do it well*. ...
>> a.  Why exactly would it need to? 

>> b.  Actually, Emacs does (do one thing well):
>> It handles editing-style text manipulation,
> Fair points, I can't argue with any of them. I think it's really just a
> matter of opinion as to what text editor you use, ,,

Of course.

Note that I wasn't arguing which editor anyone should use (just how Emacs
does somewhat fit that Unix philosophy).

(Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]

Reply to: