Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mike Castle wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Paul Scott <email@example.com> wrote:
>> GNU is an OS, Linux is a kernel.
>> Unfortunately popular usage has led to Linux incorrectly meaning GNU/Linux
>> and even more.
> How much GNU software is required before it has to have the GNU moniker?
> If my machine uses the Linux kernel is mostly busybox instead of
> coreutils/textutils/shutils do I have to keep using GNU/Linux?
> If I use a BSD kernel with mostly GNU software, do I have to call it
> GNU/BSD? (Something I'd find very amusing, by the way.)
If I run GNU Emacs, GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program), GNUnet, MinGW
(Minimalist GNU for Windows) etc on Windows, does that mean I have to
call it GNU/Windows? :D
Harry Rickards (a.k.a l33tmyst)
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GAT/GCM/GCS/GCC/GIT/GM d? s: a? C++++ UL++++ P- L+++ !E W+++ N o? K+
w--- O- M- V-PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t 5 X R tv-- b+++ DI D---- G e* h! !r y?
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----