Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Nuno Magalhães <nunomagalhaes@eu.ipp.pt>]

> Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
> recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
> reporting erroneous values?

I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:

DVI:
# xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
   1280x1024      60.0*
   1280x960       60.0
   1152x864       60.0
   1024x768       60.0
   800x600        60.0     56.0
   640x480        60.0

RGB:
# xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
   800x600        60.0*    56.0
   640x480        60.0
   400x300        60.0     56.0
   320x240        60.0

Although, these are the drivers i have:
xserver-xorg-video-ark (don't know why i have this one anyway)
xserver-xorg-video-fbdev
xserver-xorg-video-nv
xserver-xorg-video-vmware

Would installing any other xserver-xorg-video-* make a difference?

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto