In <[🔎] 49e791b8.02ab100a.0542.25a5@mx.google.com>, Sthu Deus wrote: >Thank You, again, And what is Your opinion on volatile for clamav, for >example& - It always says to me, it is out dated. I have volatile enabled, and it says it is outdated to me, too. That's just a result of upstream desire conflicting with Debian policy. Upstream wants you to always be using the latest (stable) release. Debian policy is to not introduce new upstream versions during the lifetime of the stable release. Release-critical and security fixes can be backported the version in the release if need be. If you trust upstream for that package, you might want to follow backports/testing/unstable/experimental for that package. If you don't, trust aptitude (Debian) to let you know when there is an update and ignore the warning. For me, I use stable+security+volatile for my systems that need to be always available and secure. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.