[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: No soft-links for scp?



> Hey,
> Ah, in that case then the `sshfs mount && cp -sR` idea is probably going
> to work best.

Exactly what I wound up doing, and it works great. The read / write
speed on the files is faster than with ssh through konqueror as well.

> If you don't want to get sshfs running then you could
> also try generating the links on the server side then using scp/rsync to
> get them.  Something like:
> me@server $ cd /tmp/links && cp -sR /path/to/dir ./ && rsync -a
> /tmp/links/ me@laptop:~/links/`hostname`
>

I thought about doing that when I was reading the rsync manpage and I
saw that the -l option preserves symlinks. I did not test it, though.

-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il

א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه‍-و-ي
А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я
а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-й-к-л-м-н-о-п-р-с-т-у-ф-х-ц-ч-ш-щ-ъ-ы-ь-э-ю-я
ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü

Reply to: