[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply

On Monday 05 January 2009, hose <subscriptions@bluemaggottowel.com> wrote 
about 'Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, 
>On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
>> Ken Teague <kteague@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>>> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients.  ;)
>Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt).  It has sane reply,
>reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend
>to your will if needed, no matter how wrong you are.  It's the vim of
>the email world.

Does it work outside of a terminal, yet?  :)  Seriously though, mutt *is* a 
very high-quality MUA.  Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt 
is worth a look.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss@iguanasuicide.net                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: