Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply

[hose <subscriptions@bluemaggottowel.com>]

On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
> Ken Teague <kteague@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > > See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients.  ;)   
> > > Kmail replies
> > > to the list (and only to the list) by default.  (Which, actually,  
> > > appears to
> > > be a violation on the relevant standards.  :P)
> >
> > Is Kmail available for Win32?  I'm at work on my laptop and don't  
> > have
> > the luxury of Linux all day.
>
> I'm a Sylpheed fanboy; it has a built in Reply-to-list function.  I've
> never used Sylph on Windows, but when I used to follow its mailing
> list, it seemed that its Windows support was quite good.
>
> > - Ken
>
> Celejar

Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt).  It has sane reply,  
reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend  
to your will if needed, no matter how wrong you are.  It's the vim of  
the email world.

hose