[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ext4dev vs. Ext4



On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:59:07 -0600
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:

> On 12/30/08 19:36, Ken Teague wrote:
> > Slim Joe wrote:
> >> Besides the name, what's the difference between ext4dev and ext4?
> >>
> >> I'm curious because I'm planning to format a 1TB disk as ext4. It
> >> appears that the e2fs tools already have support for ext4 (with and
> >> without -"dev"). The problem is the latest Debian Linux image
> >> (2.6.26.x) has support only for ext4dev.
> >>
> >> So the only way I can use an ext4 filesystem right now is to format
> >> the hard disk as ext4dev and mount it as ext4dev. Will a subsequent
> >> kernel upgrade with support for plain ext4 allow me to mount the
> >> ext4dev-formatted disk as ext4?
> > 
> > It's to my understanding that ext4 stable was released with Linux
> > kernel 2.6.28.  I think it was still in development in 2.6.26.  I
> > would suspect that the ext4dev stuff is part of Linux kernels prior
> > to 2.6.28.
> 
> Exactly.  I'd wait to use ext4 until .29, because lots of bugs will 
> be found in the .28 cycle.

I agree. Even though I'm pretty sure Ext4 is more stable than a big
number of other popular things we got in proprietary world of
software ;) 

Regards, 
Frank
-- 
http://frank.uvena.de/en/

Attachment: pgpM8_1ZICxjh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: