Re: OO in Lenny?

To: "Rainer Kluge" <rkluge50@web.de>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OO in Lenny?
From: "Ismael Scalcon" <thesupermouse@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:10:41 -0200
Message-id: <[🔎] af3b896c0812311010l66e5fc10v44c5eb85572b9fa3@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] gjfurh$sul$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 200812310903.26495.b_kloss@web.de> <[🔎] 495B29F1.70403@allums.com> <[🔎] gjfau5$6lj$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 880dece00812310144j298aeeacg94bad91d07399d4b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] gjfurh$sul$1@ger.gmane.org>

Thatś because, as I said, the package for open office in the Debian
repos already is go-oo. Paul Cartwright, in the post above yours,
pointed that even in the official go-oo site they say that Debian have
go-oo in the repos, in the form of openoffice.org package.

That makes sense, as I took a look in the wikipedia article about
go-oo and there said that some of the patches that Sun didn't
incorporated and went to go-oo came from Debian. So, if Sun's OO don't
have Debian patches, and go-oo have, what's the reason for Debian to
support Sun's OO instead of go-oo?

2008/12/31 Rainer Kluge <rkluge50@web.de>:
> Dotan Cohen schrieb:
>>
>> These are better:
>> http://go-oo.org/
>>
>
> I don't find any debs on this site
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject
> of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>

Reply to:

References:
- OO in Lenny?
  - From: Bernd Kloss <b_kloss@web.de>
- Re: OO in Lenny?
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: OO in Lenny?
  - From: Rainer Kluge <rkluge50@web.de>
- Re: OO in Lenny?
  - From: "Dotan Cohen" <dotancohen@gmail.com>
- Re: OO in Lenny?
  - From: Rainer Kluge <rkluge50@web.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Command line problem
Next by Date: Re: Ext4dev vs. Ext4
Previous by thread: Re: OO in Lenny?
Next by thread: Re: OO in Lenny?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread