[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Here's something interesting... (was Re: Q: List Policy)



On Tuesday 18 November 2008, "S.D.Allen" 
<SDA@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid> wrote about 'Re: Here's something 
interesting... (was Re: Q: List Policy)':
>On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:53:47 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. in 
>gmane.linux.debian.user wrote: 
>> On Tuesday 18 November 2008, "S.D.Allen"
>><SDA@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid> wrote about 'Re: Here's
>> something interesting... (was Re: Q: List Policy)':
>>>On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:38:36 -0600, Ron Johnson in
>>> gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
>>>> The only issue I see with it is that each line ends with a "=3D20"
>>>> and that text MUAs might not filter that part out.
>>>
>>>Yes I agree. It doesn't here on slrn. It would be nice if the quoted
>>>printable could be turned off for this list. Boyd ... 8)
>>
>> Um, no.  Quoted-printable and UUENCODE are the only standard way to
>> include
>> 8-bit characters in email and UUENCODE isn't MIME-compliant.
>>
>> I'm not fine with
>> not being able to send non-ASCII characters to the list.
>
>Just curious why not UTF-8 as a charset then ?

You'd still need quoted-printable for all the bytes with the 8th bit set 
that are part of UTF-8 encoded characters.  Quoted-printable gets around 
the need for 7-bit cleanness (required by relevant e-mail standards) -- no 
bytes in the range 128-255. UTF-8 actually ascribes *meaning* to sequences 
of bytes in that range, mapping the to Unicode code points 128 and above.

I do have my client use UTF-8 as needed.

Also, quoted-printable also allows whitespace to end a line, which is 
required for the text/plain MIME type option format=flowed.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: