Re: working with svn copy on two machines

["H.S." <hs.samix@gmail.com>]

oneman wrote:
> 
> On 2-nov-2008, at 11:24, John Allen wrote:
>>>
>> Yes. Do not use rsync. Only use svn, and commit after working, and
>> update on the other machine to get the changes.
> 
> Or, if you don't like having a gazillion intermediate commits in your
> trunk, you could also create a branch an work on that. You'd commit the
> intermediate changes in the branch and merge it in trunk when you've
> completed a task, keeping your trunk's history clean.
> 
> Peter
> 
> 

Yup, this looks like a better method; it is clean. I will give this a try.

Thanks to everyone who responded.
Regards.

-- 

Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just
filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without
ever having been read.