Re: virtual private server? advice requested
> Not necessarily. I would start off with a 64MB or 128MB and load test it. If it suits your
> needs, why pay more?
it is necessary. Standard installation of apache + mysql + debian +
postfix etch consume memory more than 128MB (maybe you can do
tweaking) on my VPS server it takes 180MB+ by only running the server
without any load yet.
i did try to run the standard required for server on 64MB memory (i do
have account on VPSVillage.com) and it give me no good. I have to
upgrade to get it working.
well, i prefer XEN because that is the best virtualization to date.
Amazon EC2 and gogrid use
XEN. and XEN cannot be oversold.
On 10/14/08, Tzafrir Cohen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:35:10PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
>> On Tue Oct 14, 2008 at 21:28:50 +0000, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> > This can easily be done with a Xen guest. Not possible, from what I can
>> > tell, with a OpenVZ host.
> s/OpenVZ host/OpenVZ guest/ naturally.
>> Also OpenVZ can be oversold easily, whereas the same can't be done
>> with Xen. (Well not memory anyway.)
> THe CPU time can still be shared (and oversold).
>> Xen is probably a nice option, but UML, KVM, VMWare are all
>> much of a muchness if you're only paying peanuts for a small guest
> At least at the time I did my searches, Xen was popular among hosting
> providers. At least those that offered unmanaged Debian guests, which is
> what I wanted.
> UML had a head-start, but has no read technical atvantage, AFAIK, and
> was on the retreat when I looked (e.g: linode.com). I was surprised at
> the relative small amount of vmware-based services. KVM was not mature
> enough at the time.
> Tzafrir Cohen | email@example.com | VIM is
> http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's
> firstname.lastname@example.org | | best
> ICQ# 16849754 | | friend
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact