[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 8139cp 0000:03:08.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip



On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:24:46PM +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2008 13:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon,21.Jul.08, 03:55:20, Dominik Dera wrote:
> > > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > > and the blacklisting won't work if the module is in your initrd! You
> > > > at least need to run update-initramfs and you would probably be
> > > > advised to unpack one to make *sure* it's not in there...
> > >
> > > This problem can be solved by removing 8139cp module, and afterwards
> > > updating initramfs. So it goes like this:
> > >
> > > rmmod -v 8139cp
> > > update-initramfs -uv
> >
> > This will not survive a linux-image update.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrei
> 
> Personally, I've never found any problems with both modules being loaded. I've 
> had to add 8139too to /etc/modules, and both are loaded, and I think the 
> bootup messages complain about 8139cp, and then goes on to say "using 
> 8139too".
> 
> If the blacklisting won't work, I've had success with loading the unwanted 
> module to /bin/true, where it's loaded into nowhere land. Add a line to a 
> file in /etc/modprobe.d. I don't know if it matters which file you add it to, 
> and I put it, in the case of "pcspkr" in the alsa-base file. See below.
> 
> install 8139cp /bin/true

make a "local" file in modprobe.d so that updates to those files won't
bork your custom stuff.

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: