[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 8139cp 0000:03:08.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip




Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 10:00:49PM +0000, Jamin Davis wrote:
>> stephane lepain wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> For your problem you could try placing 8139too into
>>>> /etc/modules
>>>>
>>>> That might see that your 8139too driver gets loaded first.
>>>> Incidentally comment any references to 8139cp that you run across. HTH
>>>>
>>>> Adrian
>>>>
>>>>   
>>> After one day of trying to dig up a solution for my problem. I have  
>>> given up
>>
>> You might need a little more patience using Linux ;-).
> 
> but once it's working, it'll work so well for so long that you'll
> forget how to fix it if it comes up again...
> 
>>
>>> Nothing seems to be working. I still get the same error message
>>> "8139cp 0000:03:08.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+  
>>> compatible chip"
>>
>> You can blacklist the 8139cp module in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist file  
>> (might need to create this if it doesn't already exist):
>>
>> blacklist 8139cp
>>
>> and if you have 8139too in /etc/modules then the boot process should  
>> load that instead of 8139cp. I have checked on a machine which has an  
>> 8139too NIC and that works for me. There's a package called nictools-pci  
>> which has a file rtl8139-diag -- might be useful for fixing 8139 related  
>> probs.
>>
> 
> and the blacklisting won't work if the module is in your initrd! You
> at least need to run update-initramfs and you would probably be
> advised to unpack one to make *sure* it's not in there... 
> 
> A
> 
>  
> 

This problem can be solved by removing 8139cp module, and afterwards
updating initramfs. So it goes like this:

rmmod -v 8139cp
update-initramfs -uv

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/8139cp-0000%3A03%3A08.0%3A-This-%28id-10ec%3A8139-rev-10%29-is-not-an-8139C%2B-compatible-chip-tp15774893p18566238.html
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply to: