[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: project: wired/wireless router



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/28/08 22:05, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:04:52PM +0200, oneman wrote:
>> On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>>
>>> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
>>> ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
>>> replace the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot,
>>> but I want to be able to provide both wired and wireless LAN access. I'm
>>> looking for both hardware suggestions (i.e. a PCI card with both wired
>>> and  wireless ethernet that is supported by the kernel in stable) and
>>> configuration help.

Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato or
DD-WRT firmware.

>> Maybe not the answer that you were looking for. But seeing what your  
>> requirements are, I'd simply add a two or four port ethernet card to the 
>> case and plug a wireless bridge into one of the ports. This would be a 
>> hassle free setup and give you all the options you need without having to 
>> hunt down that probably rare or non existent card with both wireless and 
>> wired. This would also give you the future proof posibility to add 
>> another wireless bridge when a new and better standard is hitting the 
>> market. (I love to have both 802.11b and 802.11n bridges on my network, 
>> so I can have the 802.11n bridge running at its fastest setting).
> 
> Good advice. Suggestions on make/model for a multiport card supported by
> the stable distribution's kernel?

Intel cards have been well-supported for ages.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

"Kittens give Morbo gas.  In lighter news, the city of New New
York is doomed."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhnBL4ACgkQS9HxQb37XmdUTQCffJfJqGopd8pNJx9oO5lYXS20
pIgAnRa6/hD8upgVpWHP4jZ+HLvWbUMl
=7rWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: