[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RAID for large disks



On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 11:15 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 06/07/08 07:27, Mag Gam wrote:
> > 
> > I have a RAID controller with 256MB of on board cache and its connected
> > to 12 500GB SATA disks. I am planning to create 2 RAID groups (6 disks
> > each), but I don't know what is the optimal stripe size should be.
> 
> That's very controler-specific.  Read the manual.
> 
> > Also, once I stripe on the RAID controller I am planning to use LVM. Is
> > striping a good idea? What should I consider for the filesystem?
> 
> Striping is a GREAT idea IFF you want serious speed, but don't care
> about your data.  If one of the disks goes flaky, *all* the data on
> the stripeset goes poof.
> 
> So, *never* use striping on a production server!!  Unless you hate
> the company, are vindictive, and are about to leave.
> 
> Otherwise, use RAID 0, 10, 0+1 or 5.
> 
> If you make huge RAID sets, I don't see the purpose of LVM.  OTOH,

for one, if you make a bad partition choice.  With LVM, you can shrink
one and grow the other as needed.

> if you make 6 mirror sets, use LVM to make a 6 "device" unit.
> 
> Also, Damon is correct about booting.  In fact, I'd have a separate
> boot device.
> 
> Lastly, to what media are you going to back all this data up?  How
> frequently?
> 
> - --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA  USA

To back up Ron's input:

http://www.linuxjunkies.org/html/LVM-HOWTO.html#s8  it is a bit dated,
but the info is good.


-- 
Damon L. Chesser
damon@damtek.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: