On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:25:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > The crucial bit that many miss is that new packages don't move into > > testing unless they've sat in unstable with no new bug reports for 10 > > days (I think). > > Or 5 days (urgency=medium in changelog). > Or 2 days (urgency=high). > Or 1 day if it's a bad enough problem (urgency=emergency). thanks Joey. In your opinion, am I right in my assessment that testing is more likely to be in an unusable state for longer than sid? (at least at the package, not system, level)? I have been making this claim for a while, but it's really only based on my intuition of the situation and not any direct experience. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature