Re: continuity of a topic in debian-user
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Cc: peasthope@shaw.ca
- Subject: Re: continuity of a topic in debian-user
- From: peasthope@shaw.ca
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:57:07 -0700
- Message-id: <"171055438.44615.40013."@heaviside.petershouse.invalid>
- References: <351e85fb0803191255p57760cb9u2a928c6be3ec8eac@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <47E1E7CE.1050309@cox.net>
Vikki, Ron & others,
At Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:55:16 -0500 Vikki Roemer wrote,
"Because threading is done by message id
(see headers) ..."
At Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:27:58 -0500 Ron Johnson wrote,
"One that I warn you away from, Peter, is slrn."
Turns out that the Oberon MUA passes SMTP header
parameters. So thread or topic continuity requires no
more than an "In-Reply-To" or a "References" parameter.
This text produced this message you are reading.
====================
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: continuity of a topic in debian-user
References: <351e85fb0803191255p57760cb9u2a928c6be3ec8eac@mail.gmail.com>
References: <47E1E7CE.1050309@cox.net>
Vikki, Ron,
...
====================
Thanks for the comments. You helped to find the solution.
... Peter E.
--
Desktops.OpenDoc http://carnot.yi.org/
Desktops.OpenDoc http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/
Reply to: