[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian vs centos as server



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/26/08 19:08, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> hhding wrote:
>> why debian?
>> why centos?
>>
>> It seems same to me, and current we run debian as server.
>> But managers want run centos instead.
>>
> 
> If you are using some proprietary software that is supported on RHEL (or
> Centos) and not on Debian, and you depend on that support.
> 
> Can't think of any other reasons. We run a couple of proprietary

I can think of an obvious reason:  RH is "known", i.e., management
has heard of it, and it's a *company*, as opposed to a bunch of
left-wing communist hippies that want to destroy capitalism.

> applications at work that are only supported on RHEL. I have had no
> problem running them on Debian Etch. YMMV.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

"(Women are) like compilers.  They take simple statements and
make them into big productions."
Pitr Dubovitch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHxMNBS9HxQb37XmcRAtpJAJ4p/qQNZbCTS3W58AXL2I00i3MRaACfTXp2
edznO//UU7qMo6HDsSQmJmg=
=6Otf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: