Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote:
Personally I like the anarchy of this OT stuff - and respect that people *do* mark the subject line as [OT] which is entirely appropriate because it enables those who do not want to pursue OT threads to scroll on by.On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:23:08 +0300 Atis <atis@BEST.eu.org> wrote:On 6/1/07, Peter Gruessing <reviewdirector@yahoo.com> wrote:I thought this was a Debian Linux mailing list?>????Yes, this is, but there is often accusation, that this is list for users of Debian, and as such, may contain any discussions of Debian users. What i have to propose - create separate ML for offtopic discussions. A little background for this: I'm involved in European student organization, and about half year ago a separate ML was created, named junk@. It has no rules, and people are encouraged to discuss there anything silly/political/religious, without any consequences. What have become of it - it's really strengthening community, making people to know each other better. Not to mention, that other MLs have become much cleaner and topic-related. Regards, AtisYes, but offtopic threads evolve from on-topic ones. It would be very annoying to see posts like this: ... this is I could do to help you, and see my offtopic opinion on junk@list. Not to mention that when people not subscribed to the debian-user list read an offtopic reaction without the previous context (users will almost always forget to include it), most likely they will post several "What are you referring to?" answers. I just wanted to say that it's a good idea to have an unmoderated "offtopic" list, but it wouldn't reduce much of this list's offtopic messages. I say - keep it as it is. A -- "If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." - Thomas Pynchon, "Gravity's Rainbow" |