On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:33:39PM +0000, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:20:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in > [🔎] 20070405022021.GA12522@santiago.connexer.com: > > > No, the media has suspect motives. The Red Cross generally has OK > > motives, though they are a bit left-leaning in their official views. > > ..the red cross is left-leaning. Uh-uh. And I thought red was the > religious righteous republican color. Now, the Nazis might agree with > you here, I'm only aware of Danish Jews getting Red Cross visits in the > concentration camps. > I was thinking that their decision to eschew moral absolutes (i.e., by not condemning the terrorists) is quite leftist. > > I did not mean professional as in career volunteer soldiers. I was > > referring to their comportment while POWs. > > ..for those germans holding norwegians or airmen or officers POW in WWII, > I agree, for those holding Tuskegee airmen or GI's, I know too little, > for those holding Jews, Polish, Russian etc "untermänchen" I disagree, > these people were treated to neocon standards. > Holy cow, man! Do you not read? I was talking about German soldiers who were held as POWs by the allies. > >> > My perspective is this. We start off treating them nice and > >> > professionally. > >> > >> ..where? Sissy Boy George started these war crimes by policy, before > >> invading Afghanistan. > >> > > Cite? > > ..chk 9/12-2001 thru 11/23-2001 EO's and White House lawyer tap dancing, > if your lawyer pays me, I might do shill dance details here. ;o) > Nov. 20 Executive Order: Delegation of Certain Authorities and Assignment of Certain Functions Under the Trade Act of 2002 Nov. 15 Executive Order Regarding Undocumented Aliens in the Caribbean Region Oct. 7 Executive Order: Creating a Board of Inquiry to Report on Certain Labor Disputes Affecting the Maritime Industry of the United States Sept. 18 Executive Order: Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Where? > > I don't get it. Why should the US be hed responsible for the actions of > > the Iranian media? > > ..nice try on diversion. All you need is a common interest in killing > off the (moderate) Iranian middle class people. > Except that you have a problem with the US condemning Iran for parading around captives on TV for propaganda. I am simply asking why the US should be held responsible for that? That is an action of the Iranian state-run television media. How does your (obviously false) hyperbole about the US wanting to kill the Iranian middle class have anything to do with that? > > However, it is a show of goodwill and civility. > > ..then you should _try_ beat Adolf Hitler on military ethics. > Again, saying that Hitler had any sort of military ethics is nothing more than a demonstration of your complete divorcement from reality. If a serial killer is a "good family" man, does that make him a role model for anybody on anything? No! Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature