robomod@news.nic.it
This is new. I've been getting these directly to me too after I post.
What can Debian do about this?
It seems that some newsgroup has decided to tie into the list but then
rejects everything noisilty back to the posters.
Doug.
----- Forwarded message from Moderation Robot <robomod@news.nic.it> -----
Envelope-to: dtutty@localhost
Delivery-date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:34:28 -0400
From: Moderation Robot <robomod@news.nic.it>
Subject: Re: Re: Repost of some earlier described "challenges"
To: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:02:03 +0200 (CEST)
linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway
with a mailing list.
Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program
and has been refused because:
this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users.
You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-gate@lists.bofh.it
mailing list. You can do so by sending a message with "subscribe" in the
body at the linux-gate-request@lists.bofh.it address or by visiting
http://lists.bofh.it/listinfo/linux-gate .
For more information about the linux.* hierarchy please read the FAQ
at http://www.linux.it/~md/linux-faq
Virtually your,
The Moderation Robot.
------- Follows the first few lines of your article --------
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user
Subject: Re: Repost of some earlier described "challenges"
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:50:08 +0200
Message-ID: <97QFW-3Uz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <[🔎] 46F9C507.6050204@sbcglobal.net> <[🔎] 20070926224549.GA5220@bt> <[🔎] 20070927011909.GB8923@titan.hooton> <[🔎] 200709271135.04539.ariestao@clearmail.com.au>
Old-Return-Path: <dtutty@porchlight.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Porchlight-Mailscanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-Porchlight-Mailscanner: Found to be clean
X-Mailscanner-From: dtutty@porchlight.ca
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2007-05-24_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/498731
List-ID: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:40:00 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <[🔎] 20070927014000.GF8923@titan.hooton>
X-Original-References: <97uYL-3yn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <97O1v-8gR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <97QcS-3kX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <97Qwg-3Ir-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Bytes: 2527
X-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:51:17 GMT (bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Trace: b59cb46fed768ef7b7d1a22875
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:35:04AM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Douglas A. Tutty shared this with us all:
> >--} One of the later steps is to upgrade from latest sarge to latest-etch.
> >--} Etch is now at r1. ?The tested upgrade path is r0. ?Since so much
> >--} changed between r0 and r1, there may be problems; I don't know.
> >--}
>
> I have installed several machines with the first netistall etch CD since the
> above change and have found no breakages. Update and then upgrade have worked
> a treat. Just watch the prompts.
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: