[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SELinux Suggestion



Am 2007-09-22 00:00:09, schrieb Mumia W..:
> It probably is good technology. But I think it should be good 
> technology--elsewhere.
> 
> Including SElinux in Debian is not like including tuxracer. Too much of 
> the core security parts of Debian have to be changed to accommodate SElinux.
> 
> If I want SElinux, I should get Redhat or Fedora. But I use Debian, and 
> I'd like to be SElinux-free here.

Sorry, I do not like Redhat/Fedora since updateing of HA-Servers is a mess.
I no use Debian sind over 8 years and I am "Debian GNU/Linux Consultant"
and have installes Debian on over 4000 Computers since 1999.

Debian SElinux-free would be one of the biggest errors in the history of
Debian.  I am reals sure, that there are MORE serverinstallations as
Workstations based on Debian.

> Manoj said that SElinux is not yet fully integrated into Debian, and I 
> think that's good because it gives us time to re-evaluate if we need 
> SElinux, and I hope we can re-evaluate it out of Debian.

Forget it, I think, even if Manoj is already working on a SElinux enforced
distribution, all of his work should be go into Debian GNU/Linux.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: