Re: em64t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/07 04:45, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 20:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/09/07 19:07, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> "[...]it's clearly stated" - I meant the difference between IA-64 and
>>> EM64T/AMD64 (emphasized right below "IA-64" heading at
>>> http://www.debian.org/ports/), not EM64T -> Intel 64 marketing name
>>> change.
>> I see reference to "Intel's first 64-bit architecture" and "Intel
>> 64-bit extensions", but nothing that says that "Intel 64" is a new
>> marketing name.
>
> Okay, one more clarification then: I did _not_ mention "Intel 64"
> based on Debian's website. See Intel's site, for instance:
I thought you did, since the "ports" page was the only link you put
in your email.
> http://www.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/intel64/
Ok, that makes sense now.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGvF3hS9HxQb37XmcRAtS4AJ9knuaO+hZwmbIBzlPk5XzJgUQzvQCgxWoR
bMAMdcIyVJPUTZnwUTrGkOg=
=iQtU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to:
- References:
- em64t
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>
- Re: em64t
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>
- Re: em64t
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>
- Re: em64t
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>