Re: em64t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 19:07, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Well, it's clearly stated on the overview page I provided. EM64T was
>>> recently renamed to "Intel 64" - but, yes, the names here can be
>>> confusing.
>> Where? I've looked and looked, but don't see it. (I am getting
>> old, though, and do need glasses.)
>
> "[...]it's clearly stated" - I meant the difference between IA-64 and
> EM64T/AMD64 (emphasized right below "IA-64" heading at
> http://www.debian.org/ports/), not EM64T -> Intel 64 marketing name
> change.
I see reference to "Intel's first 64-bit architecture" and "Intel
64-bit extensions", but nothing that says that "Intel 64" is a new
marketing name.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGu7vWS9HxQb37XmcRAuebAJ9zqFjp30Z44hgq1keTjVypFhiKxACfSzH1
uQi9QoyCf5jXjNOy9359rbg=
=QkyU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>
- References:
- em64t
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>
- Re: em64t
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>
- Re: em64t
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: em64t
- From: Krzysztof Lubański <luban@nerdshack.com>