Re: replacement for apt-listchanges?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/07 14:37, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-08-06 08:16:08 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
>> Or maybe you now need to file a bug saying that "it" returns 0 even
>> in a failure condition.
>
> I suggested that as a simple workaround. The maintainer doesn't want
> to change it because some users (running unstable) don't know how to
> disable a package (it may be needed to disable apt-listchanges
> temporarily to fix things). That's quite surprising for users who
> run unstable... Of course, this may need more work from the user,
> but with less risk to break the system.
>
> But there could be better solutions such as using a wrapper, as
> I suggested first in my bug report:
>
> When apt-listchanges cannot run (e.g. because of bug 435674), the
The last time that happened to me (6-8 months ago), I dropped
apt-listchanges. Reinstalled it a few weeks later.
> user misses all the changelog information (which may contain critical
> information, such as some NEWS announcements). So (in particular
Excellent.
> because breakage due to python occurs too frequently), it is important
I still don't have any evidence that python breaks frequently.
> that apt-listchanges runs in a wrapper with few dependencies (e.g.
> only the libc) so that it can warn the user if the changelog/news
> information cannot be displayed and let the user abort the
> installation.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGt4DWS9HxQb37XmcRAuigAKCvL12MddPq2lRhYsAmOwx03WP5lwCePmpu
k1bVOxXz6apD7MP9/d21hzU=
=bcZ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: