Re: Testing anti spam software
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/07 23:04, Matthias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 23, 3:30 pm, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>> The issue is not with debian iteself, but rather my implementation of
>>> signal handling. My feeling is that in trying to write code for a
>>> large cross-section (debian, BSD, GNU), I missed something that debian
>> GNU? Hurd?
>>
>>> specifically needs to be told for proper signal handling.
>> But Debian is "just" Linux.
>
> I've had no reports of signals not working on Hurd. The two debian
> machines that I have on report on indicate that the signals were simpy
> ignored. Perhaps a difference in the implementation of sigaction vs
> signal?
>
> Hopefully I can get some more reports from Debian users that the
> problem has been corrected with the updates I've done.
But that means that Debian Developers are the way that "Linux" (the
kernel? libc?, something else?) are deeply changing The Way Unix Works.
And I just don't believe they'd do that. For one thing, they're all
pretty busy, and making such deep changes to every new version of
upstream would be "time consuming".
Have you tried Fedora, SuSE, Slackware, etc?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGpY6dS9HxQb37XmcRAsFKAJ9f05qmVfXfCGTSkhFQhUHuRQAbKwCgz4NT
ROQOPBOw6voZTlIG7xIemMQ=
=Jhcb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: