On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:32:04PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:19:12AM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal > > <orestesleal13022@cha.jovenclub.cu> wrote: > > > > >On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400 > > >Matthew K Poer <matthewpoer@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid. > > >>> > > >>> It *is* faster than iceweasel. > > >>> > > >>> But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that > > >>turns > > >>> out to be a wash. > > >>> > > >>> Hugo > > >> > > >>Are you *begging* for a flame war? > > >> > > >>I have always thought that FireFox was faster than Opera. Did you use > > >>"safe > > >>mode" (no extensions)? > > > > > >What? > > >Seamonkey it's the fastest. > > > > None faster than elinks. ;-) > > > Hah. I *real* geek could mentally render the raw HTML faster. what is the browser thing of which you speak? there is something other than telnet www.google.com 80 ?? A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature