[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Opera is faster, but...



On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:19:12AM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal  
> <orestesleal13022@cha.jovenclub.cu> wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
> >Matthew K Poer <matthewpoer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >>>
> >>> It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >>>
> >>> But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that  
> >>turns
> >>> out to be a wash.
> >>>
> >>> Hugo
> >>
> >>Are you *begging* for a flame war?
> >>
> >>I have always thought that FireFox was faster than Opera. Did you use  
> >>"safe
> >>mode" (no extensions)?
> >
> >What?
> >Seamonkey it's the fastest.
> 
> None faster than elinks. ;-)
> 
Hah.  I *real* geek could mentally render the raw HTML faster.

:-)

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: