Re: Opera is faster, but...
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:19:12 -0700
"Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:17:45 -0700, Orestes leal
> <orestesleal13022@cha.jovenclub.cu> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:05:11 -0400
> > Matthew K Poer <matthewpoer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday 09 July 2007 1:06 pm, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >> >
> >> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >> >
> >> > But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
> >> turns
> >> > out to be a wash.
> >> >
> >> > Hugo
> >>
> >> Are you *begging* for a flame war?
> >>
> >> I have always thought that FireFox was faster than Opera. Did you use
> >> "safe
> >> mode" (no extensions)?
> >
> > What?
> > Seamonkey it's the fastest.
>
> None faster than elinks. ;-)
Is elinks faster than links and links2 (serious question, I don't have
any idea) ?
> Octavio.
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Reply to: