Re: Browsers can connect but Konqueror not (Was: What is ASSERT: "!icon.isEmpty()" ?)
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 14:43, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:27:10AM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > > > Internet browsing works only with the new account.
> > > > But I can browse local directories on both configurations.
> > > > So apparently something is corrupted in .kde directory...?
> > >
> > > Search through ~/.kde/share/apps/konqueror/ and
> > > ~/.kde/share/config/konquerorrc trying to find anything that looks
> > > clearly wrong.
> > >
> > > I might just backup ~/.kde/ to a temporary location and blow away those
> > > configuration directories and files, but you should try the more
> > > conservative approach first.
> > I moved .kde to .kde_backup, restart Konqueror but had same problem !?!
> > I'll make closer comparison between fresh new working user versus
> > non-working user on the files mentioned by Mumia just here before and
> > keep you in touch later today (I'm not on my Debian machine yet).
> Look for differences between all the startup files of both users:
> .bashrc, .bash_profile, .bash_aliases, .X*, .x*. Also, try clearing out
> stuff in /var/tmp/kdecache-user.
> Justin case KDE is being sneaky, rename that .kde_backup to badkde.
> I don't know what WM/DTE you're using, but try logging out, having root
> move/rename the .kde stuff, then log back in.
I deleted and re-created the user. Now it works.
Note: I do not want to start any flame here against Debian.
I'm a real Linux lover : I come from a Fedora system and simply decided to
install few days ago Debian Etch-4 to give a try after reading that it was
(after a long delay it seems) available in a stable status and because, after
all, Debian is at the origin of so popular distros like (K)Ubuntu.
But I have to admit (once again : I really do not want to start here any flame
and I really respect Debian) that such problem is cumbersome.