On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:17:16PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:40:08PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > > > > Then you missed the overall point, the human point, of the matter. > > > IMAP may be better, but for many people, they have a lot more to do > > > than to continually adapt their systems and deal with downloading > > > headers first, then deleting, or using other work arounds. The > > > issue of IMAP vs. POP was yours and yours alone and was a technical > > > point that was in response to a larger issue. > > > > Actually, Amy Templeton asked whether someone would have to switch to > > IMAP in order to enjoy those same benefits. In any case, welcome to > > the "bash Roberto festivities." I hope you enjoy your stay. I guess > > now I have to start apologizing for posting *on-topic* on top of > > everything else? > > Did it ever occur to you that there is a reason for "bash Roberto > festivities"? Perhaps your behavior is much more offensive to others > than you realize and perhaps they are trying to signal you that they do > not find it acceptable. > Did it ever occur to you that your own behavior is even more offensive? The least you could have done was read my post and the parent post before flying off the handle at me. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature